In the last couple of months, tens of thousands of people have emailed their MPs telling them to support a clean power target in the Energy Bill. This vote is now set for the 4th June.
If you haven't written to your MP yet - email them now asking them to support the clean energy target.
If your MP has replied to your email with some excuses as to why they are not supporting the target, then you can follow up. Here is some help debunking the claims they might have made – tailored for Conservative MPs or Lib Dem MPs.
Reply to a Conservative MP
Many Conservative MPs have been sending the same stock response to our emails. It tries to claim that the government has already done what we are asking for and committed to setting a target to clean up power. If only that were the case! Here is a template response for you to adapt and send in reply.
Have a look at the Friends of the Earth rebuttal document for more information.
Dear Conservative MP,
Thank you for your letter. I am glad to read that the government is committed to setting a decarbonisation target. However, nothing in the current legislation commits the government to setting one either now or in the future. The Government’s amendments only take the power to set a target, but do not say that they will. Even if a target was set, it would not have to be set in 2016 - this is just the earliest year a target could be set under the government’s proposals. Additionally, the target could be set at any level and would not have to be consistent with meeting our Climate Change Act goals.
This is the main reason that many renewable energy companies and investors have said they need more certainty if they are going to invest in the new green jobs that Britain desperately needs. Major manufacturers such as Siemens, Vestas and Dong recently wrote an open letter to the government calling for this target which was published in the Times newspaper saying:
"Postponing the 2030 target decision until 2016 creates entirely avoidable political risk. This will slow growth in the low carbon sector, handicap the UK supply chain, reduce UK R&D and produce fewer new jobs"
The Committee on Climate Change has given clear advice that a decarbonisation target for the power sector of 50g of carbon per kWh by 2030 should be set now. They most recently wrote to the government asking them to introduce a target into the Energy Bill in February. You can find this letter here. They have recommended this as part of their duty to advise on the most cost-effective way to meet Britain’s legally binding commitment to cut our carbon emissions by 80% by 2050.
Given the above, please could you add your name to, and vote for, the amendments tabled by Tim Yeo MP and Barry Gardiner MP to introduce a decarbonisation target by 2014 in line with the advice of the Committee on Climate Change. These are amendments numbers 11 – 19. This would ensure our commitment to decarbonising the power sector by 2030 is enshrined in the Energy Bill.
Reply to a Lib Dem MP
Lib Dem MPs have been replying to emails with a variety of excuses as to why they cannot support the target, so pick the rebuttal which matches up to your reply. Thanks to Greenpeace for putting this together.
Your MP said: I am pleased with the Energy Bill as it currently stands, as it will make the UK less reliant on fossil fuels and will encourage a massive investment in renewables and other forms of low-carbon energy.
You say: Whilst the Energy Bill does indeed represent an opportunity to cut our reliance on fossil fuels and drive investment in renewables, clean energy investors and businesses say the Bill needs improvement before that’s certain to happen. It needs a 2030 clean energy target.
Earlier this year, Ernst & Young warned: “The main source of disappointment for investors was confirmation that a decarbonisation target will not be set until 2016. This delay cast doubts over the UK’s commitment to cut carbon emissions 50% by 2027 and left investors with a sense of uncertainty.”
Worse, some of the biggest manufacturing companies in the world – including big wind energy companies like Siemens – also warned on the front page of The Times recently that they could cancel billions of pounds worth of new wind turbine factories and green jobs in the UK unless the Energy Bill includes a clear goal to decarbonise electricity by 2030. They wrote, "A binding 2030 target for power sector decarbonisation would help to reduce the political risk currently associated with long-term UK industrial investment."
Your MP said: As a Liberal Democrat, I have always understood the potential benefits of having a decarbonisation target within the Energy Bill itself, as I recognise that the transition to a low-carbon economy is one of the most significant challenges facing the UK in the coming decades. Nevertheless, when governing as part of a coalition, it is often the case that certain compromises have to be made.
You say: Lib Dem Energy Secretary Ed Davey, in a speech to his own party said, “The Liberal Democrats are not for turning….. investors crave certainty. Stability. The confidence that Governments will stick to their word… That’s why there’s a strong case for a carbon limit for Britain’s energy grid for 2030. Energy is always a long term investment. So if we are to create greater investor confidence in Britain’s low carbon energy future, a long-term target is best.” Yet turning is precisely what he seems to be doing.
Lib Dem members voted to make it Lib Dem party policy.
It is true Conservatives in government are opposed to the target. But MPs from across the party political divide – led by the Conservative Tim Yeo - are putting partisan point scoring aside and backing a package of amendments that would see a target set now. If Lib Dems choose to back Tim Yeo’s green jobs amendments now, they can make their own party policy into law. It’s time for Lib Dems to stick to their green promises.
Your MP said: In order to guarantee that all of the other positive aspects of the Energy Bill could become law alongside the financial support for low carbon generation, it was necessary to forego the possibility of setting a decarbonisation target now. Significantly however, the Bill provides powers for a 2030 decarbonisation target to be set in 2016.
You say: The Bill currently says the government ‘may’ set a target in 2016. They don’t have to. Saying that a decarbonisation target may or may not be set some time after the next general election just isn’t good enough. Failing to prioritise decarbonisation with this Bill risks jeopardising green growth, and putting up both energy bills and carbon emissions. That’s because it could fire the starting gun on more imported and expensive gas, instead of more home grown renewables.
Your MP said: The power to set a target for 2030 in 2016 means that the target can be decided alongside the 5th Carbon Budget, at a time when the Government will be considering how to set the UK on course to sustainably meet its 2050 target of an 80% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions.
You say: The Committee on Climate Change – who advise the government on what’s required to hit their legally binding carbon targets – have said there is no scenario in which we can stay within carbon budgets without decarbonisation of electricity by 2030, so this is simply a bad excuse. Additionally - as Ed Davey himself has acknowledged - companies considering their energy investments now need to know now what will be the direction of UK energy policy for years to come. They should not have to face years of more uncertainty.
Your MP said: The Coalition Government remains wholeheartedly committed to being the greenest government ever.
You say: It is impossible for this to be the greenest government ever if it deliberately rejects both the advice of its own advisers on climate change and the warnings of the clean energy companies who want to create green jobs in this country.
It surely isn’t unreasonable to ask a Lib Dem to vote for a popular Lib Dem policy - one that has the backing of scores of businesses, churches, civil society groups and energy experts?